It's *really* handy (for example) if we can take a 60fps timeline and render it at 30fps or (for YouTube) perhaps a 25fps timeline and render it at 50fps (seems to give fewer compression artifacts for the same bitrate when YT re-encodes it to VP9), etc, etc.Īs Resolve becomes a more powerful and general-purpose tool it would be a shame not to support the new markets that are embracing it.Īnother +1 for this here! I'm one of those amateur editors you mention in your posts. Although Resolve was designed primarily for professional editors (often focused on 24fps) the reality is that it's now being used by a wide range of editors (pro and amateur) who, like myself, end up using quite a variety of frame rates, depending on the actual composition, the cameras available and the look we're going for.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |